I have to clarify this, because it’s a point that screams out for repeating.
Why do people’s minds get blown, or why do I get flat-out denial, when I point to studies showing that mental illness isn’t even correlated with violent criminal behaviour?
The only scary correlation here is that the mentally ill are more likely to be victims of violent crime.
If you want good reasons for immediate, massive funding of public mental health programs, I can give you a half dozen off the top of my head.
Preventing violent crime isn’t one of them.
That’s why the motivation for thia sudden support for universal healthcare by Republican gun nuts annoys the living shit out of me.
Pointing to this fabricated correlation extrapolated from a handful of cases as a good reason to fund mental health is just wrong (and anti-scientific). It’s predictably fucked up when the far right do it, but it’s utterly perverse when the left follow along like sheep.
Stigmatisation comes from false stereotypes like this.
To push it is to hurt the mentally ill and to buy into the NRA agenda. It distracts from the real problem of gun culture and the need for the United States to properly regulate firearms.
Gun ownership is actually correlated with violent crime; and a causal relationship isn’t difficult to establish. If you’re serious about stopping violent crime, tackling gun ownership should be the focus.
A cry I’ve anticipated, but thankfully haven’t yet heard, from the left (who accept the evidence) is that any delusion that brings the far right to the table on universal healthcare is OK, as long as it gets the job done.
I don’t think it’s worth throwing the dignity of the mentally ill under a bus for a deal.
It’s hard enough seeing a psychiatrist for the first time without everyone else assuming that you’re a danger to society.
Look at the evidence and think things through, please.